{"id":2143,"date":"2021-03-10T13:37:39","date_gmt":"2021-03-10T12:37:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/?page_id=2143"},"modified":"2026-04-15T20:56:49","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T18:56:49","slug":"raporty-prawne-wts","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/publikacje\/raporty-prawne-wts\/","title":{"rendered":"WTS Legal Reports"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The amendment of the Polish Industrial Property Act (WTS Legal Report No. 1\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Changes in the civil procedure – Part 1 (WTS Legal Report No. 2\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. The CRISPR\/Cas9 case before the European Patent Office (WTS Legal Report No. 3\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Changes in the civil procedure – Part 2 (WTS Legal Report No. 4\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Pay-for-delay agreements in rulings of the CJEU (WTS Legal Report No. 5\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Unified Patent Court \u2014\u00a0a future that dissolves into a pipe dream? (WTS Legal Report No. 6\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Can the Unified Patent Court be saved? (WTS Legal Report No. 7\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. European Union trade marks and Brexit (WTS Legal Report No. 8\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  9. Pepper case: exceptions to patentability in the opinion of Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO of May 14, 2020 (WTS Legal Report No. 9\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  10. Deposit of Biological Materials (WTS Legal Report No. 10\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  11. The conditions for granting an SPC – the judgment of the CJEU in Royalty Pharma case (WTS Legal Report No. 11\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  12. The judgment of the CJEU in the Santen case- A new medical use of an existing product and an SPC eligibility (WTS Legal Report No. 12\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  13. The claim to increase a remuneration for an employee\u2019s invention in the Polish legal system (WTS Legal Report No. 13\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  14. First filing requirement in Poland (WTS Legal Report No. 14\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  15. Patent rights: an obstacle for development of a vaccine against COVID-19? (WTS Legal Report No. 15\/2020)<\/a><\/li>\n
  16. The Unified Patent Court. A new episode in the long-running series (WTS Legal Report No. 1\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  17. New guidelines published by the President of the Polish Patent Office (WTS Legal Report No. 2\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  18. What is permitted under the TRIPS Agreement when it comes to the scarcity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines? (WTS Legal Report No. 3\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  19. The Debate on the Suspension of Patents for Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 (WTS Legal Report No. 4\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  20. The New EPO Guidelines: An Overview of the Key Changes (WTS Legal Report No. 5\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  21. Infringements of second medical use patents. An overview of the selected case law (WTS Legal Report No. 6\/2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  22. Patent linkage in the proposed amendment to the Polish Reimbursement Act (WTS Legal Report No. 1\/2022)<\/a><\/li>\n
  23. SPC Manufacturing Waiver (WTS Legal Report No. 2\/2022)<\/a><\/li>\n
  24. Criminal sanctions in Polish Industrial Property Law (WTS Legal Report No. 3\/2022)<\/a><\/li>\n
  25. Clinical trials and the novelty of the invention (WTS Legal Report No. 1\/2023)<\/a><\/li>\n
  26. The possibilities of asserting rights by the co-inventor omitted in the patent application (WTS Legal Report No. 2\/2023)<\/a><\/li>\n
  27. Exhaustion of patent rights (WTS Legal Report No. 3\/2023)<\/a><\/li>\n
  28. The ban on NGT plants\u2019 patentability? (WTS Legal Report 2024)<\/a><\/li>\n
  29. Launch-at-risk of generics not that risky anymore (WTS Legal Report 2024)<\/a><\/li>\n
  30. Prior national rights (WTS Legal Report 2024)<\/a><\/li>\n
  31. Post-filing data in the most recent case-law of the EPO (WTS Legal Report 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n
  32. The right of priority (part 1): The transfer of the right of priority (WTS Legal Report 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n
  33. The right of priority (part 2): Cross-IP priority claims (WTS Legal Report 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n
  34. The long-arm reach of the UPC (WTS Legal Report 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n
  35. Expansive Jurisdiction of the UPC vs. a Torpedo Action before a National Court (WTS Legal Report 2025)<\/a><\/li>\n
  36. Technical judges: International practice and a proposal for a Polish regulation (WTS Legal Report 2026)<\/a><\/li>\n
  37. Technical judges: the Swiss model (WTS Legal Report 2026)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The amendment of the Polish Industrial Property Act (WTS Legal Report No. 1\/2020) Changes in the civil procedure – Part 1 (WTS Legal Report No. 2\/2020) The CRISPR\/Cas9 case before the European Patent Office (WTS Legal Report No. 3\/2020) Changes in the civil procedure – Part 2 (WTS Legal Report No. 4\/2020) Pay-for-delay agreements in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":2104,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"protect_children":false,"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2143"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2143"}],"version-history":[{"count":49,"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3385,"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2143\/revisions\/3385"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wtspatent.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}